My attorney has a way with words

Edited Perhaps I will post the entire letter someday.  Marie responded ex parte to my counsel that Ray was an honorable man, leader of the year, ex military and a fine family man and with a veiled threat.  My attorney talked to some of her friends from the police department.


April 26, 2013
Beth S

Suite 750


Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 

re: Marie Hanna

Dear Ms. S


June 5, 2012, is a very important date to Mr. H, indeed. And it is the date to
which Marie Hanna has agreed is the valuation date for assets and debts in the division
of property in this divorce.

June 5, 2012, is the date on which Marie Hanna abandoned her 26 year
marriage without warning or prior notice; and the date that she notified David  by
email that she considered their marriage over and had removed his son from his home
of 15 years. What she told their son, Thomas, to persuade him to also abandon and
reject his father, all without warning, is not known.

As Ms. Hanna knows, prior to that time, she had repeatedly assured David
 that she was not leaving their marriage, that she was not having a sexual affair
with anyone, and indeed acted in all ways  as though she was still devoted to, remaining in and
improving her marriage with David .

Ms. Hanna's leaving as she did, without notice, and with only an email as
information to Mr. H, has caused and continues to cause him emotional pain and
distress. She had a special telephone just for her calls to Ray Lambert; when she left it
clearly where Mr. H could find it, and he realized it contained over 54 hours of
telephone calls to Ray Lambert, complete with photos of her, of course Mr. H suffered significant distress.

Finding out during discovery that Marie Hanna has been planning this
abandonment and co-opting of their son for many months, including extensive legal
consultation with you, Ms. Silverman, has caused Mr. H to look at Ms. Hanna in
an entirely different light.

Her request that the Court order him to pay her spousal support to supplement
her relationship with Ray Lambert was especially brazen.

Mr. H knows that Marie Hanna has purchased furniture for Ray Lambert
and that she has been house hunting with him, all during the time that she was assuring
David  that they were well and truly married to one another.

Her choosing to take very little in the way of household furniture and furnishings
is another indicator that she has hidden significant quantities of cash and investments
which she intends to spend after the Divorce Decree is entered.

While Mr. H has no difficulty providing the information requested in your unnumbered
paragraph 6, and of course expects the same detail and documentation from
Marie H, as well as the information requested above about her employer
contribution, Mr. H also expects complete documentation of each and every dollar
she has spent with and on Ray Lambert, the amount, the date, the purpose, as well as
details about her expenditures of her income since January 1, 2011, and the
expenditures of the business expense reimbursement which she withheld from the joint
account in 2012, and money spent for attorney's fees in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

It is amusing that Marie Hanna wants "peace of mind about accepting the June 5
date", which she already has, of course, when it is her duplicitous and deceptive
behavior which has led to total distrust of her actions and decisions by Mr. H

It is further amusing that Marie Hanna admits in your letter that she has spent
"marital funds used by her that went to purchase gifts for any other person". Of course
he won't stipulate to anything of the sort until he has complete documentation of these
gifts, the date, the amount of funds spent, the recipients and the purpose of each of
these gifts, and the current physical location of these gifts.

your unnumbered paragraph 9:
Of course, as we state earlier in this letter, David could not possibly waive
martial claim to amounts of money for gifts to othes since he knows nothing of what
gifts Marie Hanna has so generously bestowed. He won't stipulate to anything of the
sort until he has complete documentation of these gifts, the date, the amount of funds
spent, the recipients, the purpose of each of these gifts, and the current physical
location of each.

And while she is making her affidavit for gifts, Mr. H wants her affidavit to
include what she spent her business expense money for - see Stipulation 3 - he cannot
agree to waive it if he does not know what it was spent for.

None of these choices concerning her sons speaks well of Marie Hanna as a
professional educator, not to speak of as a mother and wife. So, no, David H is
not going to participate in Marie Hanna's further schemes.

I have supported Mr. numerous attempts to work out reasonable
resolutions and action steps for the remaining issues. Mr.  thought that and Ms.
Hanna had resolved issues and had established an efficient framework in which to
resolve the remaining issues that have not been settled. He has come to the
conclusion, however, that Ms. Hanna prefers to play games - agreeing in one
conversation and email and then changing her mind within 24-36 hours on the identical
topic. She is determined, apparently, to present a constantly moving target.
He is coming the realization that a trial in June may be the best resolution of
several of these issues. Ray Lambert will be on the witness list.

After completing this letter yesterday late afternoon, the mail brought your letter
asking for a continuance of the June 27 trial date so you could take another vacation,
this time to Israel.

Mr. H and I do not agree to a continuance of the trial date and we will
oppose any attempt you make to obtain one.

Sincerely,

AL

Definition of the day

mer·ce·nar·y

  [mur-suh-ner-ee]  Show IPA adjective,noun, plural mer·ce·nar·ies.

adjective

1.

working or acting merely for money or other reward; venal.

2.

hired to serve in a foreign army, guerrilla organization, etc.

noun

3.

a professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army.

4.

any hireling.

Here us a similar definition;

prostitute

noun

1.

a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money; whore; harlot.

2.

a man who engages in sexual acts for money.

3.

a person who willingly uses his or her talent or ability in a base and unworthy way, usually for money.

 

Conflict of Interest Definition from Pearson

Definitions from the Pearson Ethics Point site (Pearson Owns Ohio Connections Academy)

Conflict of Interterest:

Any situation in which a person - such as a public official, an employee, or a professional - has a private or personal interest in a business relationship sufficient to appear to or to actually influence the objective exercise of his or her official duties. (Examples include, but are not limited to: inappropriate vendor or customer relations, misuse of confidential information, inappropriate and deliberate exercise of influence for personal gain.

Would this apply to a boss, Raymond M Lambert, with an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate?  Sorry Marie Hanna the sex was not good enough so I promoted Anna instead?

A message from Marjorie

Pearson Owns Ohio Connections Academy

 

A Message from Marjorie

If we want Pearson to be known as a company that is brave, imaginative and decent, with everything these words imply, all of us have to conduct ourselves that way. That isn't always easy. It involves doing not only what is right for the business, but also what is right ethically, in the wider context of culture and society. It means not only abiding by the law, but also abiding by the highest principles of integrity, honour and concern for other people.
Of course rules can't always tell us the correct way to behave, but the principles outlined in our code of conduct are our starting point. They spell out our basic standards for conduct in Pearson - what we mostly already know and already do, what we expect of anyone connected with our company, and what we accept responsibility for doing when we become a part of the company.
Beyond these principles, I believe we can rely with confidence on the fact that Pearson employs people who know right from wrong and who have the morals, self-respect, professionalism and concern for others to do the ethical thing even when the circumstances are confusing.
Unfortunately, we sometimes encounter situations or become aware of behaviour which conflicts with our ethical standards. It's important that we address these incidents promptly and take corrective action. If you are concerned about any behaviour which seems to you to be in conflict with our code, it's important that you report it, either by using this website or by calling the toll-free whistleblowing hotline numbers provided. All reports will be entirely confidential and will be followed up by our Pearson Legal Counsel (Bob Dancy) and our Head of Group Internal Audit (John Brennan).
Thank you all for inspiring and confirming that confidence every day.
Marjorie Scardino

Definitions from the Pearson Ethics Point site

Conflict of Interterest:

Any situation in which a person - such as a public official, an employee, or a professional - has a private or personal interest in a business relationship sufficient to appear to or to actually influence the objective exercise of his or her official duties. (Examples include, but are not limited to: inappropriate vendor or customer relations, misuse of confidential information, inappropriate and deliberate exercise of influence for personal gain.


Employment Discrimination or Unlawful Harassment (Including Sexual Harassment
Unfair treatment on the basis of age, race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, or other characteristics protected by law, with respect to hiring, discharge, compensation, promotions, assignments, performance management, or other terms/conditions of employment is discrimination. Unlawful harassment, a form of discrimination, is unwelcome verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct directed toward another that targets any of characteristics listed above and creates a hostile/intimidating working environment. Sexual harassment occurs when such conduct is sexual in nature, or when it is expressed or implied that an employee’s tolerance/non-tolerance of such sexual conduct will change the terms/conditions of employment. Examples include unwanted sexual advances, requests/demands for sexual favors/acts, flirtation, sexually-oriented comments/gestures, or display of objects, pictures, or literature


What say you Ray?  Any issues here?

How is connections Ohio Academy Funded?

Check out PearsonEthics.com for an easy anonymous  form for reporting ethical violations

 
 

Question

Thought for the day:  David Petraeus

Do you think he should have resigned?

I thought there was some code of honor in the military.  Seems like about every month another military officer resigns under scandal.

I did ask Marie Hanna  if she thought he should resign.   I never received a response.

I understand that Ray Lambert was ex military and the leader of Connections Academy and carrying on with my wife and his subordinate.  I wonder what Pearson would think about that situation.

I wonder how deserved the promotions were?  One way to get to the top!

Favorite Amendment. 1st Amendmendment. Free speech, free to express my opinions

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Life advice from "inmates"

Kind of off topic


All you need to know, from the meaning of life to mechanical theory is all located in one convenient web site.  I personally think it the best site on the inter web.  Great stories, photos and advice.

So what is this site?

ADVRIDER.com

I am personally fond of the ride reports, picture sections, inmates and JoMamma.

There are stories related to failed relationships, family life and dating.


This was helpful:

"As for the healing aspect... I try to explain it this way. It's going to be bad, and then it's going be really bad, and then it's going to get much worse. And then very slowly, so slowly that you won't even notice at first it'll get better. And it will continue to slowly get a tiny bit better each day until one day you look around and realize it's actually pretty damn good."

"And I do believe that as little contact with the Ex is for the best, at least for many, many years."

"Learn to cook the children will appreciate it."

It is a collection of some very interesting individuals.  Most are pretty intelligent.

Church State and Money covers al of these subjects.

Check it out.